Showing posts with label National Theatre Of Scotland. Show all posts
Showing posts with label National Theatre Of Scotland. Show all posts

Saturday, 16 June 2012

'Macbeth', National Theatre of Scotland, Tramway, Glasgow, 15/6/12

Touted as a one-man performance of the Scottish play by a well known Scot in Scotland's second city this production of Macbeth is rather hit and miss.
The setting by Merle Hensel is some sort of cell or ward within a mental institution complete with tiled walls, security cameras and a steel staircase to the secured door and this reminded me of the hospital setting used a few years back in a production that featured Patrick Stewart in the title role. Here we have Alan Cumming playing almost all the roles and speaking the majority of Shakespeare's lines.
The concept is one of the things that work completely; indeed the concept itself seems confused - was this man who we see confined to this ward part of the events he replays in his mind or is he so utterly delusional that he creates the play complete within himself (albeit with the addition of props that are either part of the 'evidence' that come with him or just happen to lie about the stage)? Beyond the man himself there is the doctor and orderly who infiltrate his delusions - what is there purpose?


The production starts slowly and I tended to drag at times in the first half. Once Macbeth's ascent to power is completed and his descent begins things move along at a more appropriate pace, thankfully. Throughout the sound effects and music were a constant and often annoying presence and were clearly used to set mood and effect, as was the constant variation of lighting; sometimes it seemed barely a minute would pass before the next lighting cue was executed. This rushed execution was also given to the text, which was quite truncated, and often seemed to be rushed through virtually eliminating the power and rhythm of most of the words. I must note that I felt most of the issues I had in this regard are with the directors John Tiffany and Andrew Goldberg rather than with Cumming himself. Cumming showed instances of brilliance in some of his many portrayals although they could often be so confused that a familiarity with the plot, if not the text, is essential. It is also a shame that the directors elected to, wittingly or not, play down the gravitas of Macbeth and the actions preceding his rise to power and replace them often with a comedic spin. The better performance that Cumming ultimately gave was as the man (whom Cumming has apparently named 'Fred' as you can read here) who we see glimpses of between his delusional states. 'Fred''s breakdowns and wistful moments are indeed poignant and wrenching and show that Cumming is capable of so much more than he is given the chance to do here.
Because of the difficulty in distinguishing between characters (partially intended by the directors but perhaps not to the degree that the final production offers) it is a welcome relief when the two medical staff finally utter a few lines of Shakespeare and have some sort of real interaction with the man. Here one could see a germ of what could have been from this production.


It seems to me that the high concept has outweighed the production, confused itself whilst losing relevance to the story and text. There is so much that is unnecessary in this production that it threatens to completely nullify the necessary. The setting is quite vast and while this allows much space for which Cumming to play with (movement by Christine Devaney) one wonders whether a more claustrophobic setting might not have been more effective. Likewise the seemingly endless sound by Fergus O'Hare became simply annoying. Natasha Chivers' lighting became as frivolous as a child's finger upon a light switch.
The use of security cameras, in particular in evoking the weird sisters, was one of the better aspects of the production. These cameras would show real time footage of Cumming in his cell, lulling the audience into a false sense of security, before pulling some intriguing tricks and twists upon them. Ian William Galloway (Video Designer) and Salvador Bettencourt Avila (Video Production Engineer) create a sense of unease in their use though some of the execution needs a bit of tweaking.
The mental institution idea, whilst somewhat cliche, is a valid concept but the concept that surrounds Shakespeare's play as a jacket is simply too confused and offers no real purpose in being. It asks question that are irrelevant to the Shakespeare and which are never dealt with - Who is this man? Why is he here? What has he done? What are the origins of the objects that arrive with him and that are lying about the place so randomly? It's almost as if the concept has generated a play within a play unconsciously and as such has seen no reason to answer and explore these questions which, ultimately proved at least as interesting as the story 'told' by the man.

Myra McFadyen and Ali Craig provide solid support as the medical staff and I only wish there was more interaction between the three actors. Alan Cumming, as stated above, really should have been served better by his directors and, at least for most of the duration, we are not engaged with the play and Shakespeare's text as we are the ability for someone to memorise so many words and recite them in so fast a time as he does. I have seen a few production which use the concept of a mental institute and to better and more appropriate effect.

The germ of a possibly mesmerising (and Cumming was such at many a time throughout) production is here but it has yet to take root firmly. Perhaps with further development, more interaction, more precise execution ...

Friday, 2 March 2012

"An Appointment With The Wicker Man", Glasgow Theatre Royal, 1/3/12

This is only the second production I've seen from the National Theatre of Scotland (I think) and though I'm sure there are those who believe 'National' companies should produce more worthy and artistic work than this (why? Theatre should be as varied as possible) I enjoyed this production far more than their atrocious butchering of 'Peter Pan' a while back (for which I can never forgive them).

The plot is quite simple; a small amateur theatre troupe is staging 'The Wicker Man' and have called in a pro to take the part of 'Edward Woodward' as the original actor has mysteriously vanished.
As the rehearsals proceed the action off-stage starts to parallel the 'Wicker Man' story.


The writing is witty and funny even if some of the situations and surprises are old hat. The cast perform well and the direction is appropriate.
As an homage to the original film it excels, especially in that, rather than make laugh at the film (though the recreations of scenes from the film are quite funny) we are laughing at the people performing and the lengths they will and will not go to.
The play also has moments of real psychological horror especially in the in the latter half.
The performances of the songs from the film (which is really a horror musical) are among the highlights of the evening as they were performed sincerely if staged rather flamboyantly at times (intentionally so - the 'amateur' choreography and performances are a hoot).
The play is also a charming nod to the amateur circuit and the social importance of such groups. Indeed the characters are written as something akin to caricatures of 'amateur' performers yet I have been witness to such people and performances in reality.


The play begins as if we were actually watching the amateur performance, complete with cardboard boat, flat direction and wooden acting before moving backstage to rehearsals (complete with shoddily put together set pieces). We then begin to see the lines blur between play, rehearsal and the 'reality' of the situation (as seen by the pro whose presence echoes that of the character he plays). The blending of these written and directed especially well so that one bleeds into the other without any obvious transition.

While the play may not have anything to really say about the importance of amateur groups and their role within communities (or in keeping theatre alive) or anything important at all, it is still an enjoyable trek complete with laughter, sex and a little bit of terror thrown in.
If anything, despite this being a 'comedy', this does make me think that a fully staged, 'serious', crack at 'The Wicker Man' might be something truly magical.
Maybe one day ...